- Do More Newsletter
- Posts
- Do More Newsletter
Do More Newsletter
This issue contains featured article "The Human Standard: Do You Own What You Create With AI?", and exciting product information about FocusFlow Studio, ScriptCraft AI Studio, Google Gemini 'Personal Intelligence' in AI Mode, Microsoft Paint & Notepad AI Features, and Amazon One Medical AI Chatbot.
Keep up to date on the latest products, workflows, apps and models so that you can excel at your work. Curated by Duet.

FocusFlow Studio is a consumer AI productivity app that turns a messy day of tasks, meetings, and distractions into a visual “timeline” it automatically optimizes for focus. It reads your calendar, to‑do lists, and even email labels to suggest a realistic daily plan, then dynamically reshuffles when meetings move or new tasks arrive. For creators and knowledge workers, it offers “creative blocks” that carve out uninterrupted time for writing, design, or coding, and uses lightweight prompts to help you get started instead of facing a blank page. The app’s goal is to make your day feel intentional without forcing you to learn a complex project‑management system.
ScriptCraft AI Studio targets video and social‑media creators who need to move from idea to published content quickly. The app generates video scripts, B‑roll shot lists, thumbnail concepts, and caption variations from a single short prompt or link to an article. It then assembles everything into an editable storyboard, so you can keep your style while still benefiting from AI speed. This kind of tool reduces the “pre‑production drag” that slows small creators and solo marketers, freeing them to spend more time recording, editing, and engaging with their audience.
Google has introduced “Personal Intelligence” to its Gemini AI Mode — allowing the assistant to connect securely to your own Gmail and Google Photos (opt-in) to provide tailored recommendations and responses. This makes AI suggestions more meaningful and context-aware — for example, helping plan vacations based on past photos or suggesting tasks based on your calendar entries — pushing productivity and personalized interaction forward.
Microsoft is rolling out fresh AI-powered creative and productivity enhancements for core Windows apps. In Paint, users can now generate AI-powered coloring book pages from simple text prompts, turning ideas into printable artwork — perfect for casual creative projects. Meanwhile, the Notepad app gets improved AI tools for writing, rewriting, summary generation, and richer Markdown support. These updates reflect how even basic desktop apps are getting significant AI upgrades.
Amazon has expanded into consumer health with an AI assistant inside the One Medical app, helping patients with symptom guidance, appointment scheduling, and medication management. This marks a notable shift toward integrating agentic AI support in everyday consumer wellness, allowing people to get health advice and logistical assistance directly through conversational AI — bridging the gap between medical knowledge and patient experience.

FocusFlow Studio is a new AI‑powered planner designed for everyday users who want the benefits of an executive assistant without learning a heavy project‑management tool. After connecting your calendar and favorite task apps, FocusFlow builds a visual timeline of your day that balances meetings, deep work, and breaks. Instead of asking you to micromanage time blocks, it proposes a plan and updates it automatically as new tasks appear or events shift. The interface is intentionally simple, so you can see at a glance what you should be doing now and what can safely wait until later.
The standout new feature is “adaptive focus blocks,” which use AI to detect which tasks really require uninterrupted concentration and then protect those windows in your schedule. When you mark a task as important or mentally demanding, FocusFlow looks at your historical activity patterns—such as when you usually complete tasks quickly vs. slowly or when you tend to move meetings—and chooses time slots where you are most likely to succeed. As interruptions happen, it reschedules intelligently instead of simply pushing everything later, so crucial tasks do not silently fall off your radar. The benefit is that your best energy is reserved for your most meaningful work, with less effort on your part.
Within each adaptive focus block, the app offers a lightweight guidance panel rather than a rigid workflow. You can see a short, AI‑generated checklist derived from the task description, suggested sub‑tasks to break big projects into smaller steps, and optional “starter prompts” to help overcome procrastination. For example, a vague task like “work on presentation” might be broken into “decide key message,” “collect three data points,” and “draft first three slides,” which makes it easier to get moving. The guidance stays collapsible so you always remain in control; the AI is there to reduce friction, not to dictate your process.
For users who like to experiment and optimize, FocusFlow Studio also provides clear feedback about how the feature is performing. A simple analytics view shows how often focus blocks were kept intact, which kinds of tasks you usually finish inside them, and when your concentration windows appear to be strongest. You can adjust settings such as preferred focus length, buffer time between meetings, and how aggressively the app should defend your schedule from new invites. Over time, this helps you co‑design a workday that feels calmer and more sustainable, while still being ambitious about what you want to get done.
The Human Standard: Do You Own What You Create With AI?

We are living in the "magic button" era of creativity. With a simple text prompt, you can summon a baroque oil painting, a debugging script, or a sonnet about space travel. The speed of creation is intoxicating, but it brings a legal hangover that creators are only just beginning to understand.
If you spend hours crafting the perfect prompt to generate a novel or an image, who owns the result? Is it you? The AI company? Or is it, legally speaking, no one at all?
For creators looking to monetize or protect their work, the answer is critical. The United States Copyright Office (USCO) and recent federal court rulings have drawn a line in the sand: Copyright protects human authorship.
But where exactly does the machine end and the human begin?
The Short Answer: No, You Don't Own the Raw Output
If you type a prompt into Midjourney, ChatGPT, or Claude, and the system spits out an image or a block of text, you generally do not own the copyright to that raw output.
This stems from a foundational principle of US copyright law: authorship is a uniquely human attribute. In the eyes of the law, an AI is not a tool like a camera or a pen; it is a generative system that makes "expressive decisions" of its own.
The "Monkey Selfie" Precedent
This strictly "human" requirement wasn't actually invented for AI; it was solidified by a crested macaque named Naruto.
In what became known as the "Monkey Selfie" case (Naruto v. Slater), a nature photographer named David Slater left his camera unattended in an Indonesian jungle. Naruto, the macaque, picked it up and snapped several photos of himself, including a now-famous grinning selfie.
When the photos went viral, Slater tried to claim copyright. However, PETA sued on behalf of the monkey, arguing Naruto was the author. The courts had to decide: Can a non-human own a creative work?
The answer was a resounding no. The court ruled that copyright law does not extend to animals. The US Copyright Office has applied this exact same logic to Artificial Intelligence. Just as a monkey cannot be an "author" because it lacks humanity, a software algorithm cannot be an author. If a human didn't make it, a human can't own it.
The Case of Zarya of the Dawn
So, if the machine is the "monkey" in this scenario, how much do you need to contribute to get a copyright? We look to the landmark case of Zarya of the Dawn.
In 2023, the USCO reviewed a comic book created by Kristina Kashtanova. She had written the story, but she used the AI tool Midjourney to generate the artwork. She argued that she was the author of the images because she spent hours "guiding" the AI with specific prompts and rejecting hundreds of results until she got exactly what she wanted.
The Copyright Office disagreed. They granted her a copyright, but with a massive asterisk.
The Text: She wrote the script. Copyrighted.
The Selection and Arrangement: She chose which images to use and how to place them on the page alongside the text. Copyrighted.
The Images: The actual visual art generated by the AI. NOT Copyrighted.
The ruling established a critical precedent: Prompts are not authorship. The USCO compared prompting to giving instructions to a commissioned artist. If you hire a painter and say, "Paint me a cyberpunk detective," the painter gets the copyright, not you. With AI, since the "painter" is a machine (and machines have no rights), the image enters the public domain immediately.
How Much Contribution is Enough?
If the raw output belongs to no one, how do you cross the threshold into ownership? The key is to move from being a "prompter" to being an "editor" or "curator."
The Copyright Office looks for "human-authored contributions." Here is the hierarchy of contribution:
1. The Prompt (Zero Ownership)
No matter how long, detailed, or "creative" your prompt is, it is currently viewed as a set of instructions. You cannot copyright the output based solely on the effort of prompting.
2. Selection and Arrangement (Thin Copyright)
This is the "curator" approach. If you generate 10,000 AI images and select 20 distinct ones to arrange into a specific sequence (like a comic book or a storyboard), you can copyright that specific compilation.
What you own: The specific order and layout.
What you don’t own: The individual images themselves. Someone else could take those same images and rearrange them without infringing on your copyright.
3. Modification (Partial Ownership)
This is the "editor" approach and your best bet for ownership. If you take an AI-generated text and rewrite it, or take an AI image and open it in Photoshop to paint over it, you are adding human authorship.
The Standard: The changes must be more than "de minimis" (trivial). Fixing a typo or changing one pixel isn't enough. You must add a sufficient amount of original creative expression.
The Result: You own the copyright to the changes you made, but the underlying AI material remains unprotected.
Practical Steps for Creators
If you are using AI in your workflow and want to protect your final product, you need to treat the AI as a raw material generator, not a finished product machine.
Transform, Don't Just Generate: Never use the raw output. Rewrite the AI drafts. Paint over the AI sketches. The more you touch it, the stronger your claim to authorship.
Keep Your Receipts: If you ever need to register a copyright, you may be asked to prove which parts are human. Save your drafts. Document your editing process. Show the "before" (AI output) and "after" (your final version).
Be Honest on Registration: If you register a work with the US Copyright Office, you are required to disclose AI-generated content. You must exclude the AI parts from your claim (e.g., "Claim: Text and visual arrangement. Excluded: AI-generated illustrations"). Failing to disclose this can lead to your copyright being cancelled entirely.
Your Input Matters
The answer to "Do I own what I create with AI?" is a frustratingly nuanced "It depends."
You own the creative choices you make. You own the words you actually write and the pixels you actually paint. But you do not own the magic. As long as the AI is doing the heavy lifting of converting an idea into expression, that part of the work belongs to the world—just like Naruto’s selfie.
For the modern creator, the lesson is clear: Use AI to brainstorm, to outline, or to generate raw materials. But if you want to own the final product, you have to be the one to finish it.

Partner Spotlight: IT Agent – Is Your IT Team Overwhelmed? This Helps.
Most IT teams are understaffed and buried in tickets. IT Agent is built for that reality: an AI-powered platform that monitors your endpoints, auto-patches vulnerabilities on your schedule, and actually suggests fixes to common issues so you can approve them instead of troubleshooting from scratch. It even auto-documents processes by shadowing your admins—no more outdated runbooks. Starts at $49/month per technician with unlimited endpoints. Find more information or sign up at IT Agent.
Stay productive, stay curious—see you next week with more AI breakthroughs!